Is a Design Error Quietly Inflating Your Project Budget?

 Is a Design Error Quietly Inflating Your Project Budget?

I recently reviewed a project stalled in the permit phase. The city had flagged it for an "Alternative Solution"—a sign of a fundamental compliance issue. The problem? A simple error in building classification.

The design was for a 3-storey single-family house, but it was incorrectly classified under the requirements for a 4-storey Part 3 building. In reality, it rightly belongs under the simpler, more efficient Part 9 provisions.

That one classification mistake was on track to cost the owner over $100,000 in mandatory fire protection systems—including sprinklers, standpipes, a pump room, and backup power—along with a lengthy, complex approval process.

This is exactly why early and expert code review is essential. Had I been engaged from the start, my focus would have been to:

✅ Correct the building classification and guide the design team back to the appropriate Part 9 path.

✅ Eliminate the need for the costly Alternative Solution and the unnecessary systems it triggers.

✅ Secure the building permit efficiently, avoiding preventable delays and expenses.

The takeaway for developers, builders, and owners is clear: a proactive code review isn't just about compliance—it’s a powerful financial safeguard. Catching a single error early can mean the difference between a project that stays on budget and one that spirals unexpectedly over by tens, if not hundreds, of thousands.

Let’s connect to discuss how a strategic code consultation can de-risk your next project and protect your bottom line.

#BuildingCode #CodeConsultant #ConstructionManagement #CostSaving #ProjectFeasibility #BuildingPermit #Architecture #ResidentialConstruction #FireProtection #ProjectRisk

Building Safely and Efficiently: Insights from a Plans Examiner

 Building Safely and Efficiently: Insights from a Plans Examiner

After 12 years as a professional plans examiner, I’ve reviewed and approved more than 8000 projects.

One startling fact stands out: over 50% of building permit plans are put on hold after preliminary review, with some delays stretching beyond a year.

The reason? Designers often struggle to fully grasp the complexities of building code requirements.

As a business or building owner, it can be challenging to know which designer is right for your project. You might select someone from a directory or be drawn to an impressive website—but without the right expertise, you risk costly delays, unnecessary expenses, and even safety issues.

Here’s another eye-opener: up to 80% of projects—whether interior renovations, additions, or new builds—could save at least 20% on construction costs.

For example:

An unnecessary fire separation wall might cost you 50% more than needed.

Using wood studs instead of steel studs for partitions could save over 40% in material costs.

One recent project was a six-story building designed as noncombustible. Simply raising the grade by 600mm would have allowed it to be built as combustible—saving over $1 million.

But it’s not just about savings—it’s about safety.

I once reviewed a primary school over 3,000 sqm, valued at $30 million. Despite code requirements for noncombustible materials, it was built with combustible ones. This isn’t just a financial loss; it’s a safety risk for the children inside.

So here’s my advice:

No matter which designer you choose, having an independent code expert on your team can make all the difference. They work in the developer’s interest—not as an assistant to the architect—helping avoid mistakes, ensuring compliance, and uncovering opportunities to save both time and money.

Before your next project, ask yourself:

Do I have the right expertise backing me up?

The answer could save you more than money—it could save your project.

Let’s build smarter, safer, and more efficiently.

#BuildingCode #Construction #CostSavings #ProjectManagement #Calgary #SafetyFirst #Architecture #Design #BuildingPermits

Navigating the Code: How a Second Look Saved a Clinic Project Time and Money

 Navigating the Code: How a Second Look Saved a Clinic Project Time and Money

Have you ever been told a building code requirement was going to add significant cost and complexity to your project? Sometimes, a second look can reveal a smarter, more efficient path.

I was brought into a clinic project for exactly this reason. The initial design for the new Calgary clinic location included a costly new barrier-free washroom within the tenant space. The team was prepared to build it, but they wanted to be sure it was truly necessary.

After reviewing the architectural plans and the Alberta Building Code, I found that it wasn't. The existing building already provided fully compliant, accessible washrooms for the floor's occupant load. We provided a formal letter of interpretation citing specific code clauses, which allowed the designer to remove the redundant washroom from the plans.

The lesson? A deep dive into the code isn't just about finding problems—it's about finding opportunities for efficiency. We helped save the client time and money, all while maintaining full compliance.

If you're facing a confusing code challenge on your project, let's connect! I help architects, designers, and business owners navigate the complexities of the building code.

#BuildingCodeConsultant #ConstructionSolutions #CostSaving #ArchitecturalDesign #AlbertaConstruction #ProjectEfficiency #BuildingCode

Canadian Builders & Investors: A Critical Check for Your Imported Materials

 Canadian Builders & Investors: A Critical Check for Your Imported Materials

As a Canadian builder or property investor, you're likely evaluating cost-effective options, including imported construction materials from China or other countries. While global sourcing can be competitive, one step is non-negotiable for compliance and risk management.

Before you proceed, you must ensure these products are certified for use in Canada.

As per the National Building Code of Canada (NBC), compliance can only be determined by:

✅ An evaluation report from the Canadian Construction Materials Centre (CCMC)

✅ A listing by ULC

✅ A report from an organization approved by the provincial Building Administrator

This isn't a suggestion—it's the law.

Here’s your essential pre-purchase checklist:

➡️ Ask your supplier: "Do you have a valid CCMC evaluation report for this product?"

➡️ Verify: "Is this product ULC listed?"

➡️ Confirm: If it's another certification, is the issuer approved by the provincial authority?

Using unverified products is a massive financial gamble. If your Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ)—the building inspector—refuses to accept it, you face costly delays, rework, and potential liability.

Protect your project, your investment, and your reputation. Always demand the correct Canadian certification.

#BuildingCode #ConstructionCanada #PropertyInvestment #RiskManagement #CCMC #ULC #BuildingMaterials #ConstructionSafety #AHJ #CanadianBuilder

Tired of "Alternative Solutions"? Let's Talk About "Right-Sized" Plans Instead

 Tired of "Alternative Solutions"? Let's Talk About "Right-Sized" Architectural Plans Instead.

"You should try an Alternative Solution." If you're a building owner facing permit delays, you've probably heard this.

But I often advise my clients to be cautious. While valuable in specific cases, alternative solutions can introduce significant cost, complexity, and risk. Why choose a difficult path when a simpler one exists?

The problem isn't always a lack of creativity—it's that the initial plans weren't "right-sized" for the project and the code.

A "Right-Sized" plan is:

- Fully Compliant using well-understood, prescriptive code paths.

- Optimized for Value, eliminating costly over-engineering that doesn't enhance safety or function.

- Designed for Approval, with clear documentation that makes the plans examiner's job easy.

My expertise is in auditing and refining your architectural drawings to achieve this. We work to:

1. Identify & remove overkill that's slowing you down.

2. Clarify the intent behind every design decision.

3. Strengthen your submission so it stands on its own merits, without needing a complicated alternative solution.

Don't pay a premium for complexity. Let's build a case for simplicity and get your project moving.

Have you had an experience where an "Alternative Solution" created more problems than it solved? Share below.

#ConstructionManagement #ValueEngineering #BuildingCode #PropertyDevelopment #CostSaving #RightSizedDesign