Tired of "Alternative Solutions"? Let's Talk About "Right-Sized" Architectural Plans Instead.
"You should try an Alternative Solution." If you're a building owner facing permit delays, you've probably heard this.
But I often advise my clients to be cautious. While valuable in specific cases, alternative solutions can introduce significant cost, complexity, and risk. Why choose a difficult path when a simpler one exists?
The problem isn't always a lack of creativity—it's that the initial plans weren't "right-sized" for the project and the code.
A "Right-Sized" plan is:
- Fully Compliant using well-understood, prescriptive code paths.
- Optimized for Value, eliminating costly over-engineering that doesn't enhance safety or function.
- Designed for Approval, with clear documentation that makes the plans examiner's job easy.
My expertise is in auditing and refining your architectural drawings to achieve this. We work to:
1. Identify & remove overkill that's slowing you down.
2. Clarify the intent behind every design decision.
3. Strengthen your submission so it stands on its own merits, without needing a complicated alternative solution.
Don't pay a premium for complexity. Let's build a case for simplicity and get your project moving.
Have you had an experience where an "Alternative Solution" created more problems than it solved? Share below.
#ConstructionManagement #ValueEngineering #BuildingCode #PropertyDevelopment #CostSaving #RightSizedDesign
