🚧 Partial Permits: Proceed with Caution to Avoid Costly Pitfalls 🚧
Many developers and contractors view partial permits (or foundation permits) as a milestone—a signal to begin construction. However, this approach often carries significant risks, shifting liability to the owner while creating a false impression of progress.
The Illusion of Progress
Partial permits are frequently issued not because the design is fully compliant, but due to resource constraints within the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ). Despite charging substantial fees, the AHJ may not conduct a thorough review upfront, leaving the owner responsible for unforeseen issues later in the process.
Key Risks of Partial Permits
✔ Full Liability on the Owner – If subsequent reviews reveal major deficiencies, the owner bears the cost of redesigns, delays, and even rework—not the AHJ.
✔ Inflexible Foundations – Structural adjustments mandated after the fact can lead to costly modifications to rebar, footings, and other critical elements.
✔ Wasted Time and Resources – Starting construction before full approval risks rework, doubling both effort and budget if revisions are required.
A More Strategic Approach
🔹 Prioritize Design Quality First – A well-prepared, code-compliant design significantly reduces delays during the approval process. Engage experienced professionals to ensure accuracy before submission.
🔹 Engage a Building Code Consultant – A thorough third-party review can identify compliance gaps early, preventing costly revisions and accelerating permit approval.
Final Thoughts
While partial permits may seem like progress, they represent a calculated risk—one that can lead to substantial financial and logistical consequences if not managed carefully.
Have you encountered challenges with partial permits? How did you navigate them? Share your insights below! 👇
#Construction #RealEstateDevelopment #ProjectManagement #BuildingCodes #RiskMitigation #Architecture #Engineering
No comments:
Post a Comment